Drawing for VICTS

USPTO serial 76220116

VICTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VICTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009AntennasACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 30, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 17, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 1, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 17, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 9, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 16, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 25, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 17, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 23, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 25, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 5, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance