USPTO serial 76220619
LAMBDARHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAMBDARHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta T2P 2S5, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | seismic drilling tools and equipment, namely, blasting detonators for explosions used in scientific exploration; geophones used to collect and record seismic data; receivers, namely, audio receivers; cables, namely, electrical cables; seismic sounding systems comprising geophones, recorders and receivers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of seismology; seismic data and marine seismic data acquisition, processing and exploration for others in the oil and gas industry; development and design of seismic equipment and systems for others; seismic data analysis and processing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |