USPTO serial 76220975
TULA HOOB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TULA HOOB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for children, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, play sets comprised of tops with shorts; knit sets comprised of tops with shorts; jog sets comprised of sweatsuits, sweatpants with sweatshirts; trousers, pants, shorts, tank tops, rainwear, skirts, blouses, dresses, sweaters, jackets, coats, raincoats, snow suits, robes, sleepwear, pajamas, nightgowns, underwear, boots, shoes, sneakers, sandals, booties, slippers, slipper socks, athletic sneakers, swimwear, all such goods used to promote a character with this name from a children's television program | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |