USPTO serial 76221570
BREVION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREVION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kanata, ON K2 1X8, CA
Kanata, ON K2 1X8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHRUTI D. ENGSTROM
SHRUTI D ENGSTROM AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLPONE COMMERCE SQ STE 22002005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial equipment and apparatus, namely, conveyors, power operated source hoists and mechanical load and unload stations using radiation energy for disinfestation and for reducing spoilage organisms and pathogenic organisms in food, for sterilization of medical disposable products, for disposing of biological wastes and application to microbial reduction in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Industrial electronic processing equipment, namely, control consoles for industrial equipment, programmable logic control systems consisting primarily of computer software and hardware, video monitor and blank magnetic data carriers used in conjunction with irradiation equipment for disinfestation and for reducing spoilage organisms and pathogenic organisms in food, for sterilization and medical disposable products and for disposing of biological waste | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |