USPTO serial 76221664
CALTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-56242 Selters, DE
D-56242 Selters, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER
317 MADISON AVE STE 910NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOLAR COLLECTORS FOR HEATING PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | WATER HEATERS FOR DOMESTIC USE; HEATERS FOR SOLID, LIQUID OR GASEOUS FUELS; CENTRAL HEATING UNITS; PIPES FOR BOILERS; GAS-FIRED BOILERS, HEATING BOILERS; AIR-CONDITIONING UNITS; COOLING SYSTEMS FOR WATER AND AIR COMPRISED OF GAS REFRIGERATORS, COOLERS, COOLER EVAPORATORS, COOLING TOWERS, COOLING TUBES AND AIR-CONDITIONERS; WATER PIPES AS PARTS OF SANITARY INSTALLATIONS, WATER PIPES FOR HEATING SYSTEMS; VENTILATORS FOR AIR-CONDITIONING; OIL-FIRED BURNERS; SOLAR COLLECTORS FOR HEATING PURPOSES; HEATING PUMPS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |