USPTO serial 76221729
TERESITA'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TERESITA'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marigold Commodities Corporation
San Juan, Metro Manila, PH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN C/O ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Spices, namely, garlic powder, peppercorns, ground pepper; soy sauce, hot sauce, gravy, salsa | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |