USPTO serial 76221959
DAVID BROWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAVID BROWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-86863 Langenneufnach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felix J. D'Ambrosio
FELIX J D'AMBROSIO JONES, TULLAR & COOPER, PCP O BOX 2266 EADS STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles, namely, tractors | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance, repair, rebuilding, renovation of land vehicles, namely, tractors | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of tractors to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation relating to land vehicles, the manufacture of land vehicles, the maintenance and repair of land vehicles, and the renovation and rebuilding of land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thalhofer, Augustin
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DAVID BROWN
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |