USPTO serial 76222396
LTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Enertec Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, C.P. 6648, MX
Other trademarks owned by Enertec Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Enertec Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, C.P. 6648, MX
Other trademarks owned by Enertec Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
ENERTEC COMERCIAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
MONTERREY, NUEVO LEON, C.P., MX
Other trademarks owned by ENERTEC COMERCIAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
GES TECHNOLOGIES, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
CH-6300 Zug, CH
Other trademarks owned by GES TECHNOLOGIES, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
BASEL, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Diliberti
MARK J DILIBERTI FOLEY & LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric batteries for automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Enertec Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Enertec Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by ENERTEC COMERCIAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GES TECHNOLOGIES, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GES TECHNOLOGIES IP GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LTH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |