USPTO serial 76222480
CARIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2907392Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 30, 2004
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pierre C. Van Rysselberghe
PIERRE C VAN RYSSELBERGHE KOLISCH, HARTWELL, DICKINSON, ET AL200 PACIFIC BLDG520 SW YAMHILL STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Olive Farm, LLC, The
- Other trademarks owned by Olive Farm, LLC, The
- Other trademarks owned by GULLERDAGI TURIZM TARIM INSAAT VE TICARET AS
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CARIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |