USPTO serial 76222486
TODAY'S INFORMATION IS TOMORROW'S KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TODAY'S INFORMATION IS TOMORROW'S KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Theale, Re ading, Berkshire RG7 4SA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H. DeVoe
CHARLES H DEVOE KOLISC HARTWELL DICKINSON MCCORMACK ET A520 SW YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204-1324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer software and computer firmware for use in securing computers, computer networks and computer systems; computer software and computer firmware for management, analysis, monitoring and security of information and communications; computer software and computer firmware for encoding, encryption, verification, saving, storing, archiving, managing and monitoring of communications, data, images and sound; and electronic publications, namely, manuals, books, leaflets and information sheets relating to the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design, development and programming for others of computer hardware, software, firmware and computer systems, namely, computer security systems; advisory and consultant services relating to the aforementioned goods and services; and advisory and consultant services related to computer hardware, software, firmware and computer systems, namely, computer security systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |