USPTO serial 76222546
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
2275 AA Voorburg, Amsterdam, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert H. Finn
HERBERT H FINN LAW OFFICE OF DICK AND HARRIS181 W MADISON ST STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60602-4579UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | recording, transmission and reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; computers and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; personnel recruitment and counseling regarding personnel | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | education services, mainly in the field of automation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer programming; programming for electronic data processing; drawing up expert reports relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |