Drawing for LIP REDEEMER

USPTO serial 76222858

LIP REDEEMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIP REDEEMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Manny D. Pokotilow

CAESAR, REVISE, BERNSTEIN COHEN & POKOTILOW, LTD12TH FL SEVEN PENN CTRPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Lipstick, non-medicated lip care preparations and lip foundationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2004PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Jun 9, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 21, 2004PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 9, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 5, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 20, 2003PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Apr 14, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 15, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 29, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance