Drawing for SENBA

USPTO serial 76222870

SENBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Caroline H. Mead

CAROLINE H MEAD SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLPONE MARITIME PLZ STE 300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Soups, and seafood and vegetable extractsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 30, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 19, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 11, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance