Drawing for I-PEN

USPTO serial 76223238

I-PEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-PEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen C. Lee

CHRISTINA M SZITTA FISH & RICHARDSON PC PA60 S SIXTH ST STE 3300DAIN RAUSCHER PLZMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, drug delivery systems, comprising infusion pumps and injection apparatuses and accessories therefor, all for use in the treatment of diabetesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 200244DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Aug 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 2, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance