USPTO serial 76223947
ISELECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISELECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Raftopol
ANTHONY V RAFTOPOL HERZFELD & RUBIN, PC40 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, namely software used for interactive radio broadcasting or webcasting which allows a listener/user to reshape a station's music format and sequence by inputting his/her individual preferences over the Internet before, after or while listening | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Interactive radio broadcasting and webcasting of audio programming, recorded and live music events, and recorded music services involving the manipulation of such radio broadcasting and webcasting by a listener/user in order to reshape a station's format and sequencing by inputting his/her individual preferences before, after or while listening | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |