Drawing for PRECISIONMATCH

USPTO serial 76223967

PRECISIONMATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECISIONMATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Baum

ANDREW BAUM DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-7513UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING TEMPORARY, PERMANENT AND CONTRACT EMPLOYMENT PLACEMENT SERVICES, AND PROVIDING INFORMATION ON EMPLOYMENT, CAREERS AND TEMPORARY STAFFING OVER THE INTERNETACTIVEMar 22, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 13, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 1, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 15, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 15, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 6, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 14, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance