USPTO serial 76223968
PRECISIONTEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRECISIONTEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Baum
ANDREW BAUM DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-7513UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY, PERMANENT AND CONTRACT EMPLOYMENT PLACEMENT SERVICES, AND PROVIDING INFORMATION ON EMPLOYMENT, CAREERS AND TEMPORARY STAFFING OVER THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |