USPTO serial 76224233
I-CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I-CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kirchheim 85551, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra Poteat Thompson
SANDRA POTEAT THOMPSON FISH & ASSOCIATES LLP1440 N HARBOR BLVD STE 706FULLERTON, CA 92835-4120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, FOR CREATING MEDIA PRESENTATIONS FOR ON-DEMAND-RETRIEVAL OVER A NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 2000 |
| 041 | PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING AND COMPUTER USAGE IN A NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 2000 |
| 042 | DESIGNING THE SOFTWARE OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |