Drawing for ELEMENTREE RECORDS

USPTO serial 76224288

ELEMENTREE RECORDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELEMENTREE RECORDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam Claire Beezy

LAWRENCE ELI APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, headwear, footwear, tops and bottoms, tank tops, t-shirts, shirts, neckties, sweatshirts, sweat pants, sweat suits, cardigans, sweaters, jackets, coats, jerseys, vests, pullovers, pants, shorts, jumpsuits, bathing suits, underwear, sleepwear, sleep shirts, pajamas, robes, slipper socks, bandannas, scarves, neckerchieves, mufflers, hats, caps, headbands, gloves, beltsACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 8, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Nov 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
May 9, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
May 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 3, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
May 25, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
May 6, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 9, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Sep 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Aug 23, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATEDโ€”
May 29, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Mar 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Feb 10, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Feb 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 4, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Jan 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Jan 2, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Nov 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Oct 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Oct 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Apr 3, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jul 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jul 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance