USPTO serial 76224428
XENOBLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XENOBLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom manufacture of antibodies and fragments thereof for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | technical consultation in the field of biotechnology; research and development for new products for others in the field of biotechnology; scientific research for others, namely generation of antibodies and fragments thereof and generation of antibodies from single isolated lymphocytes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |