USPTO serial 76224479
THE 90'S GAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2873107Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 17, 2004
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE 90'S GAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
BOSTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHRYN JENNISON SHULTZ
KATHRYN JENNISON SHULTZ JENNISON & SHULTZ PC2001 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | board games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 18, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLINITIATIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLINITIATIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLINITIATIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by START SPACE GAMES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named THE 90'S GAME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |