USPTO serial 76224675
& BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with & BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell, Esq.
LESLIE K MITCHELL ESQ ARENT FOX PLLC1675 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit chips, potato chips, flavored ices, yogurt, packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Food and ingredients of food, namely, snack cakes, cupcakes, tarts, processed cereal and ready to eat, cereal derived energy bars, baking mixes, packaged meals, packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice, bakery goods; mixes for bakery goods; edible cake decorations; cake mixes; cakes; pies; candied fruit; candied fruit snacks; candied nuts; candy; candy cake decorations; candy coated popcorn; caramel popcorn; caramels; cereal based snack food; chocolate; chocolate chips; chocolate covered nuts; chocolate powder; chocolate syrup; chocolate topping; chocolate truffles; chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; cocoa; cocoa mixes; cones for ice cream; confectionary chips for baking; frozen confections; cookies; crackers; custard-based fillings for cakes and pies; custards; frozen custards; Danish pastries; dessert souffles; doughnuts; dumplings; eclairs; flavoring syrup; non-essential oil food flavorings; chocolate fondue; food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler; ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; frosting mixes; frostings; frozen yogurt; candied fruit; fruit ice; fruit pies; candied fruit snacks; flavored and sweetened gelatins; gingerbread; glazed popcorn; granola-based snack bars; hot chocolate; ice cream; ice cream substitute; soy based ice cream substitute; ice milk; flavored ices; icing; icing mixes; marshmallow toppings; milkshakes; bases for making milkshakes; mints; molasses; muffins; nuts; parfaits; pastries; peanut butter confectionary chips; pies; popped popcorn; processed popcorn; pretzels; puddings; puffed corn snacks; sauces; seasonings; sherbet; granola based snack bars; cereal based snack food; rice-based snack foods; wheat based snack foods; sorbet; flavoring syrup; topping syrup; tapioca; thickening agents for use in cooking; wafers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |