USPTO serial 76224677
COOKIES&
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOKIES&?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell, Esq.
LESLIE K MITCHELL FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Snack foods, namely, ground almonds, processed almonds, processed nuts, banana chips, black pudding, peanut butter, processed cherries, fruit chips, dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt, fruit-based snack foods, unflavored and unsweetened gelatins, yogurt, potato-based snack food, flavored ices, and protein based, nutrient dense snack bars | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Snack foods, namely, snack cakes, cupcakes, tarts, processed cereal and ready to eat, cereal derived energy bars, bakery goods, cakes, pies, candied fruit, candied fruit snacks, candied nuts, candy, candy coated popcorn, caramel popcorn, caramels, chocolate, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate truffles, cones for ice cream, confectionery, namely, candy, frozen confections, cookies, crackers, custards, frozen custards, Danish pastries, dessert souffles, doughnuts, eclairs, chocolate fondue, ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars, frozen yogurt, candied fruit, fruit ice, fruit pies, candied fruit snacks, flavored and sweetened gelatins, gingerbread, glazed popcorn, granola-based snack bars, ice cream, ice cream substitute, soy based ice cream substitute, ice milk, flavored ices, milkshakes, candy mints, muffins, parfaits, pastries, pies, popped popcorn, processed popcorn, pretzels, puddings, puffed corn snacks, sherbet, granola based snack bars, cereal based snack food, rice based snack foods, wheat based snack foods, sorbet, tapioca and wafers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |