USPTO serial 76224722
FLASHNEWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2003
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLASHNEWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WIRELESS FLASH NEWS INCORPORATED.
San Diego, CA
WIRELESS FLASH NEWS INCORPORATED.
San Diego, CA
WIRELESS FLASH NEWS INCORPORATED.
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Eastman
Gary L. Eastman, Esq. Gary L. Eastman, APLC401 West A StreetSuite 1785San Diego, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | News agency services, namely, gathering and dissemination of news for broadcast and print media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 13, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WIRELESS FLASH NEWS INCORPORATED.
- Other trademarks owned by WIRELESS FLASH NEWS INCORPORATED.
- Other trademarks owned by WIRELESS FLASH NEWS INCORPORATED.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLASHNEWS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |