USPTO serial 76224989
SANTA MARIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SANTA MARIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Clogan
MICHAEL R CLOGAN LLP STRASBURGER & PRICE LLP901 MAIN ST STE 4300DALLAS, TX 75202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit juices and fruit drinks | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |