Drawing for Serial No. 76225036

USPTO serial 76225036

Serial No. 76225036

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUMONT, GREGORY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76225036?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin V. Katz

Martin V. Katz Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Breton, White & Krasker, P.625 N. Flagler Drive, 9th FlooreWest Palm Beach, FL 33401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004scented and unscented candlesACTIVE—
014jewelry, namely, necklaces, earrings, bracelets, rings, and brooches; candlesticks made of precious metal; decorative objects made of silver, namely, decorative boxes, bowls, cups, dishes, baby rattles, piggy banks, and salt and pepper shakers; sculptures made of precious metal, precious stone, and semi-precious stoneACTIVE—
021housewares and glass, namely, dishes, bowls, plates, glasses, glassware, and candlesticks not made of precious metal; sculptures made of china, crystal, glass or porcelainACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance