USPTO serial 76225160
MATRACELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MATRACELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC L. McFADDEN
ERIC L MCFADDEN WILMER CUTLER PICKERINGHALE & DORR LLP1455 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Human allogenic tissue namely, cardiovascular tissue in the nature of heart valves and vascular tissue in the nature of and arteries and non-vascular tissue, namely ligaments, tendons, fascia, dura mater, pericardium, skin, intestine, and cartilage that is essentially free of cellular elements and therefore has a decreased immunological response in a human host where the tissue is intended for subsequent transplantation into a human patient | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |