USPTO serial 76225331
AMERICA'S PREMIUM SPRING WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2787692Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2003
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICA'S PREMIUM SPRING WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Hartje Cardwell
Steven B. Smith Holme Roberts & Owen LLP90 S. Cascade Ave.Suite 1300Colorado Springs, CO 80903Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Mineral waters, spring waters, drinking waters, bottled waters | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |