USPTO serial 76225682
AIC AUTOANALYST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIC AUTOANALYST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST FL 16SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing an online web site for consumers and professionals featuring automobile and motor vehicle consumer information, namely selection, availability, pricing, quotations, comparisons, and sales information and consumer product information concerning motor vehicle warranties, repair and maintenance, parts, customization and services; providing automotive and vehicular consumer and product information via a global computer network relating to vehicles for sale, valuation of vehicles for purchasers, consumers, wholesalers and retail dealers, specification and performance reviews of vehicles for purchasers, consumers, wholesalers and retail dealers, availability of vehicle parts and accessories for interested consumers, wholesalers and retail dealers, and automotive trade information and general automotive industry news; providing advertising, marketing and promotion services to others, namely the dissemination of advertising for others, promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of online advertisements, providing a website wherein users can link to the websites of the merchants and providing print, radio and television advertising, incentive awards, and cross-promotion and referral programs; E-commerce services namely providing on-line retail store services in the field of automobiles and motor vehicles; automobile and motor vehicle dealerships referral services provided locally, remotely and over the Internet and via computer and data communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design for others; computer consultation; maintenance of computer software; maintenance and updating of computer software and computer services, namely, creating, maintaining and hosting web sites for a global computer network for others for the purpose of advertising automobiles and other vehicles for sale or lease, providing automotive-related services and providing general information and specifications about automobiles and other vehicles, and parts, accessories and services for automobiles and other vehicles; providing electronic and computer based product research in the field of automobiles and motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |