USPTO serial 76225684
AUTOSPECS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOSPECS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST FL 16SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing an online web site for consumers and professionals featuring automobile and motor vehicle information, namely selection, availability, pricing, quotations, comparisons, sales, warranties, repair and maintenance, parts, customization and services information; providing automotive and vehicular information via a global computer network relating to vehicles for sale, valuation of vehicles for purchasers, consumers, wholesalers and retail dealers, specification and performance reviews of vehicles for purchasers, consumers, wholesalers and retail dealers, availability of vehicle parts and accessories for interested consumers, wholesalers and retail dealers, and automotive trade information and general automotive industry news; providing advertising, marketing and promotion services to others, namely the dissemination of advertising for others, promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of online advertisements, providing a website wherein users can link to the websites of the merchants and providing print, radio and television advertising, incentive awards, and. cross-promotion and referral programs; E-commerce services, namely providing on-line retail store services in the field of automobiles and motor vehicles; automobile and motor vehicle dealerships referral services provided locally, remotely and over the Internet and via computer and data communications networks | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2000 |
| 042 | Computer software design for others; computer consultation; maintenance of computer software; maintenance and updating of computer software and computer services, namely, creating, maintaining and hosting web sites for a global computer network for others for the purpose of advertising automobiles and other vehicles for sale or lease, providing automotive-related services and providing general information and specifications about automobiles and other vehicles, and parts, accessories and services for automobiles and other vehicles; providing electronic and computer based product research in the field of automobiles and motor vehicles | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |