USPTO serial 76226053
UROTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UROTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
01600 TREVOUX, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BROOKS R. BRUNEAU
BROOKS R BRUNEAU MATHEWS, COLLINS, SHEPERD & MCKAY100 THANET CIRSTE 306PRINCETON, NJ 08540Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PROSTHETIC BIOLOGICAL TISSUE AND PROSTHETIC SYNTHETIC TISSUE FOR SURGICAL IMPLANTATION INTO THE ABDOMEN FOR USE IN COMBATTING INCONTINENCE IN WOMEN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |