Drawing for GLOSS IT UP

USPTO serial 76226230

GLOSS IT UP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLOSS IT UP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric Melzer

ERIC MELZER GREENBAUM, ROWE, SMITH, ET ALP O BOX 5600WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095-0988UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, specifically, eyeshadow, lipstick, lip gloss, facial makeup, non-medicated skin care preparations, hair care preparations, shampoo, hair coloring, hair treatment styling preparations, and fragrances, namely, perfumes and colognesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 23, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 10, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 13, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 21, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance