Drawing for RINGS OF ETERNITY

USPTO serial 76226294

RINGS OF ETERNITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RINGS OF ETERNITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EZRA SUTTON

PLZ 9 900 RTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014JEWELRY, NAMELY, RINGS, BRACELETS, NECKLACES, EARRINGS, AND PENDANTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 6, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 6, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 12, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 14, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 28, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 27, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance