USPTO serial 76226448
MARLENE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2818708Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2004
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARLENE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-74167 Neckarsulm, DE
74172 Neckarsulm, DE
74172 Neckarsulm, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth W. King
Elizabeth W. King King Law Office, PLLC5622 Inwood DriveHouston, TX 77056-4012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | jams, marmalades, fruit jellies, fruit pastes, fruit pulp, fruit products, namely sauces, dried fruit, fruit jellies, fruit jams and fruit-based spreads; fruit and vegetable preserves, milk and milk products, namely kefir, sour milk, cheese, fresh cheese, yogurt, sweet cream and sour cream, rote crutze (kind of fruit jelly with the addition of red fruits), butter, all aforementioned goods also with the addition of yogurt, fruit and fruit extracts, natural and artificial flavors, herbs, spices, spirits, cocoa, coffee and coffee extract, malt, sugar or artificial sweeteners as taste ingredients, all aforementioned goods fresh or preserved | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Flavored and sweetened gelatin desserts and desserts made with cream, yogurt and curd | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | FRUIT JUICES AND FRUIT FLAVORED DRINKS, SYRUPS [ AND ] * FOR * MAKING FRUIT DRINKS AND SOFT DRINKS, NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY MALT BEVERAGES, SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT JUICE CONCENTRATES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MARLENE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |