USPTO serial 76226454
RANGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RANGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Zalewa
JAMES D ZALEWA LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER2 PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment brokerage services, namely, brokerage of an equity linked note | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |