USPTO serial 76226615
DUNHILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUNHILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E APOLZON
LAWRENCE ELI APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | cigarettes, cigars, cigarillos, pipe tobacco, roll your own tobacco, tobacco and tobacco products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |