USPTO serial 76226878
ANALYZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANALYZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
10115 Berlin, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL, O'TOOLE, GERSTEIN, ET AL6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software for use in the fields of business and idea exchange as well as for use in generating ideas in the field of innovation management; providing an on-line computer database in the field of computer usage; mediation of disputes regarding origination of business ideas, ideas in the field of creative problem solving, patents, utility models and patentable developments and processes; computer services, namely providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; hosting the web sites of others on a computer database in the field of business matters; computer services, namely providing on-line newsletters in the field of science, business, creativity in digital problem solving; and licensing of copyrights and intellectual property rights; mediation of business contacts in the field of information technology relating to the acceptance of advice of particular technology experts with know-how in the development of intranet systems; organization of the submission and exchange of ideas in the field of creative problem solving on the internet; and computer services, namely digital distribution of cash bounties rewarded to users for providing creative input into a web-based forum system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |