USPTO serial 76227102
AXS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AXS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
8001 Zurich, CH
8001 Zurich, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, computer programs for data management; for use as a spreadsheet; and for word processing; computer software for use in database management in the field of air transport and related industries for use in tracking and planning transportation schedules in the field of air transport and related industries; computer operating programs; computer peripherals; computer keyboards; blank magnetic data carriers; blank optical discs; computer memories; data processors; blank floppy disks for computers; computer disk drives | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring computer hardware and software; online retail store services featuring computer hardware and software; retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents in the field of computer hardware and software; mail order catalogue services featuring computer hardware and software; business management consultation in the field of air transport and related industries, namely process and project management consulting; business consultation services in the field of information technology; providing information in the field of business via the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of computer networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation services in the field of computer hardware; computer programming for others; updating of computer software; computer software development and design for others; software installation; rental of data processing equipment and computer software; leasing of computer access time for data processing; recovery of computer data; installation and maintenance of computer software; computer systems analysis; licensing of intellectual property; patent licensing; conducting technical project feasibility studies; quality control for others in the field of air transport and related industries; research and development of new products for others; consultation in the field of computer network security; technical research; surveying | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |