USPTO serial 76227464
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M Small
THOMAS M SMALL SMALL LARKIN10940 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 18LOS ANGELES, CA 90024-3915UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED AUDIO TAPES AND VIDEO TAPES AND PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS FEATURING A SERIES OF SCIENCE FICTION BOOKS | ACTIVE | Oct 18, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |