USPTO serial 76227670
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, TX
Coal Valley, IL
Coal Valley, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEO M. LOUGHLIN
OZELLE PHARMACEUTICALS INC21467 BRIAR BLUFF ROADCOAL VALLEY, IL 61240UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations used in the treatment of cancer, AIDS, hepatitus C, lupus and other viral diseases | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 27, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2013 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |