USPTO serial 76228701
VIBRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIBRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia D. Greer
CYNTHIA D GREER C/O SHAW PITTMAN2300 N ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing audio programs featuring Latin music via satellite and via a global communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |