USPTO serial 76228728
TIRELIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIRELIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
60547 Frankfurt, DE
58100 Grosseto, IT
58100 Grosseto, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F Lawrence
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the production of gases, namely, membrane-type machines for the production of nitrogen; machines for filling of tires with gas | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |