Drawing for ENTERPRISE PRINTING SOLUTION

USPTO serial 76228836

ENTERPRISE PRINTING SOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2918313Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 18, 2005
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENTERPRISE PRINTING SOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L Van Hoosear

Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear Knobbe, Martens, Olson, Bear LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN WORD PROCESSING, DRAWING CHARTS AND GRAPHS, LAYING OUT OF DOCUMENTS INCLUDING SLIPS AND DEBIT NOTES, AND PRINTING OUT OF THE DOCUMENTSSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2008C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 4, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 15, 2008CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 30, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 18, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 26, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 21, 2004PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Dec 8, 200344EASEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED—
Dec 8, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Dec 8, 2003PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance