USPTO serial 76229032
COGNITO.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COGNITO.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Horowitz
Steven Horowitz STEVEN HOROWITZ, ESQ.295 MADISON AVENUE, SUITE 700NEW YORK, NY 10017-6304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Computer education training services in the fields of computer graphics, print production, multimedia production and graphic design; training in the use and operation of computer hardware and software; multimedia entertainment software production services; training in connecting to and using the Internet and other global telecommunications networks, local area networks, wide area networks, intranets and other computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation, namely computer systems needs assessment for others; computer consultation in the fields of computer graphics, print production, multimedia production and graphic design; design printing art design; computer software design and maintenance for others; technical support, on-site and remote, for computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals, computer accessories, computer accessory supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |