Drawing for APPA EXPRESS

USPTO serial 76229183

APPA EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOYNER, CHARLES G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APPA EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE I. LERNER

LAWRENCE I LERNER LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Appetizers, namely breaded and coated meat, fish, cheese, vegetable, or processed fruit pieces; dairy-based dipsACTIVEMay 21, 2001
030sauces used as dipsACTIVEMay 21, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 14, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance