USPTO serial 76229205
Serial No. 76229205
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 2004
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76229205?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ARMOR ALL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
OAKLAND, CA
ARMOR ALL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
OAKLAND, CA
ARMOR ALL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
OAKLAND, CA
Armor All/STP Products Company, The
Oakland, CA
Other trademarks owned by Armor All/STP Products Company, The
THE ARMOR ALL/STP PRODUCTS COMPANY
OAKLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by THE ARMOR ALL/STP PRODUCTS COMPANY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tim J. Humphrey
TIM J HUMPHREY THE CLOROX COMPANY1221 BROADWAYOAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | AUTOMOBILE CLEANING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, AUTOMOBILE DRYING AGENTS, AUTOMOBILE RINSE ADDITIVES, TIRE DRESSINGS AND VEHICLE PRE-WASH; CARPET CLEANERS; GLASS CLEANERS; LAUNDRY DETERGENTS; WHEEL AND TIRE CLEANER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARMOR ALL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ARMOR ALL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ARMOR ALL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Armor All/STP Products Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by THE ARMOR ALL/STP PRODUCTS COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |