USPTO serial 76229239
MOMZILLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOMZILLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA & CHEN LLP15910 VENTURA BLVD STE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOONS, PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPES FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOONS, MOTION PICTURES FEATURING LIVE ACTION CHARACTERS, PRERECORDED VIDEOTAPES FEATURING LIVE ACTION CHARACTERS AND ANIMATED CARTOON CHARACTERS, PRERECORDED VIDEO DISCS FEATURING LIVE ACTION CHARACTERS AND ANIMATED CARTOON CHARACTERS, AND VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOON CHARACTERS, AND VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOON CHARACTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | TOY FIGURES, DOLLS, CARTOON CHARACTER DOLLS, STUFFED PLUSH TOYS, AND BOARD GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARLTON AND McGRAW PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by CARLTON AND McGRAW PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MOMZILLA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |