USPTO serial 76229347
DENSEPIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENSEPIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DenseLight Semiconductors PTE Ltd.
Changi North Industrial Estate, SG
Other trademarks owned by DenseLight Semiconductors PTE Ltd.
DenseLight Semiconductors PTE Ltd.
Changi North Industrial Estate, SG
Other trademarks owned by DenseLight Semiconductors PTE Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Murphy
JOHN M MURPHY PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY ETC311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Opto-electronic, photonic devices and microphotonic components and devices, namely photonic integrated circuits, optical mixers, lasers, laser diodes, laser drivers, super luminescent laser diodes, photodiodes, integrated circuits; semiconductor devices and instruments, namely semiconductor wafers, multiplexers, electronic multiplexers, demultiplexers, electronic demultimplexers, modulators, demodulators, modulator drivers, amplifiers, transimpedance amplifiers, automatic gain control amplifiers, limiter amplifiers, semiconductor optical amplifers, circuits, decision circuits, clock data recovery circuits, frequency converters, detectors, light intensity detectors, oscillators, filters, switches, couplers, cross-connects, phase shifters, splitters, wave guides, resonators, attenuators, transmitters, isolators, receivers, re-configurable add-drop multiplexers, integrated laser arrays, tunable lasers, Raman pump lasers, photonic gain chips, photonic laser chips, distributed feedback lasers, distributed Bragg reflector lasers, array waveguide gratings, optical channel monitors, wavelength converters, mode converters, and waveguide interferometers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |