Drawing for RESIDENTCHECK

USPTO serial 76229388

RESIDENTCHECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESIDENTCHECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL R. CLOGAN

MICHAEL R CLOGAN STRASBURGER & PRICE LLP901 MAIN ST STE 4300DALLAS, TX 75202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036CONDUCTING BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR OTHERS OF POTENTIAL RESIDENTS CREDIT HISTORYACTIVEJan 24, 2001
042CONDUCTING BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, REVIEWING EMPLOYMENT HISTORY AND CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 23, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 23, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 18, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 18, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 23, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 17, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 10, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 4, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance