USPTO serial 76229490
ROBOWATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROBOWATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian L. Wamsley
BRIAN L WAMSLEY GOODWIN PROCTER LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific equipment and instruments, namely, for navigation in unknown areas, electrical equipment and instruments, namely, for transport and movement of objects; monitoring equipment and instruments, namely, surveillance systems for the robots; measuring equipment and instruments, namely, distance and movement sensors; sensory and rescue equipment and instruments, namely, pressure and weight sensors; equipment, instruments and facilities for the transfer of messages and recording the hand-over and forwarding of objects, namely, computers, wireless LAN with access point and standard LAN; equipment, instruments and facilities for combating danger, namely, fire extinguishers, gas detectors, heat emission detectors; equipment, instruments and facilities for personnel identification as well as access control, namely, biometric methods; monitoring systems composed of surveillance software and security sensors; mobile and stationary video monitors for rooms, buildings and open areas; equipment, instruments and facilities for defense against attacks on persons, buildings and other objects, namely, mobile surveillance devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Defense systems composed of a mobile robot platform with different gas and electrical systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, electrical and mechanical robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultation services in the field of security; providing guard/watchman services; personnel, building and object protection in the nature of mobile security technology; detective services; research in the field of computer technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RoboWatch Technologies, GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROBOWATCH
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |